Skip to main content
Log in

Three-dimensional superconvergent patch recovery method and its application to data transferring in small-strain plasticity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a 3D Superconvergent Patch Recovery (SPR) method is developed for data transferring in elasto-plasticity. The transfer operators are presented for mapping of the state and internal variables between different meshes. In order to transfer the history-dependent variables from old mesh to new one, the internal variables are firstly mapped from the Gauss points to nodal points of old mesh, the variables are then transferred from nodal points of old mesh to nodal points of new mesh, and the values are finally transferred from the nodal points to Gauss points of new mesh. As the solution procedure cannot be re-computed from the initial state, it is continued from the previously computed state. Aspects of the transfer operators are presented in 3D superconvergent patch recovery technique by fitting the best polynomial function with C 0, C 1 and C 2 continuity. Finally, the efficiency of the proposed model and computational algorithms is demonstrated by several numerical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zienkiewicz OC and Zhu JZ (1992). The superconvergence patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates, Part I: the recovery techniques. Int J Numer Meth Eng 33: 1331–1364

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Zienkiewicz OC and Zhu JZ (1992). The superconvergence patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates, part II: error estimates and adaptivity. Int J Numer Meth Eng 3: 1365–1380

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Zienkiewicz OC, Boroomand B and Zhu JZ (1999). Recovery procedures in error estimation and adaptivity, part I: adaptivity in linear problems. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 176: 111–115

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Boroomand B and Zienkiewicz OC (1999). Recovery procedures in error estimation and adaptivity, part II: adaptivity in nonlinear problems of elasto-plasticity behavior. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 176: 127–146

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Kitanmra M, Gu H and Nobukawa H (2000). A study of applying the superconvergent patch recovery method in large deformation problem. J Soc Naval Arch Jpn 187: 208–210

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gu H and Kitanmra M (2000). A modified recovery procedure to improve the accuracy of stress at central area of bilinear quadrilateral element. J Soc Naval Arch Jpn 188: 489–496

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gu H, Zong Z and Hung KC (2004). A modified superconvergent patch recovery method and its application to large deformation problems. Finite Elem Anal Des 40: 665–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang X and Sato T (2004). Adaptive mesh refinement and error estimate for 3D seismic analysis of liquefiable soil considering large deformation. J Nat Disaster Sci 26: 37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Babuska I and Rheinboldt WC (1978). A-posteriori error estimates for finite element method. Int J Numer Meth Eng 12: 1597–1615

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bank RE and Weiser A (1985). A-posteriori error estimator for elliptic partial differential equations. Math Comput 44: 283–301

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Babuska I, Zienkiewicz OC, Gago J and Oliveira ER (1986). Accuracy estimates and adaptive refinements in finite element computations. Wiley, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson C and Hansbo P (1992). Adaptive finite element methods in computational mechanics. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 101: 143–181

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Zienkiewicz OC and Taylor RL (2000). The finite element method, vol. 1. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Ladeveze E, Cofignal G and Pelle JP (1986). Accuracy of elastoplastic and dynamic analysis. In: Babuska, I (eds) Accuracy estimates and adaptive refinements in finite element computations, pp 181–203. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Samuelsson A, Wiberg NE (1991) Finite element adaptivity in dynamics and elastoplasticity. In: Onate E et al (eds) The finite element method in the 1990’s. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 152–162

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee NS and Bathe KJ (1994). Error indicators and adaptive remeshing in large deformation finite element analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 16: 99–139

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Babuska I and Strouboulis T (1994). Validation of a posteriori error estimators by numerical approach. Int J Numer Meth Eng 37: 1073–1124

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Khoei AR, Tabarraie AR and Gharehbaghi SA (2005). H-adaptive mesh refinement for shear band localization in elasto-plasticity Cosserat continuum. Commun Nonl Sci Numer Simul 10: 253–286

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Khoei AR, Gharehbaghi SA, Tabarraie AR and Riahi A (2007). Error estimation, adaptivity and data transfer in enriched plasticity continua to analysis of shear band localization. Appl Math Model 31: 983–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ortiz M and Quigley JJ (1991). Adaptive mesh refinement in strain local ization problems. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 90: 781–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Camacho GT and Ortiz M (1996). Computational modeling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33: 2899–2938

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Camacho GT and Ortiz M (1997). Adaptive Lagrangian modeling of ballistic pene tration of metallic targets. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 142: 269–301

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Peric D, Hochard C, Dutko M and Owen DRJ (1996). Transfer operators for evolving meshes in small strain elasto-plasticity. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 137: 331–344

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Zlamal M (1978). Superconvergence and reduced integration in the finite element method. Math Comput 32: 663–685

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Babuska I, Strouboulis T and Upadhyay CS (1994). A model study of the quality of a posteriori error estimator for linear elliptic problems. Error estimation in the interior of patchwise uniform grids of triangular. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 114: 307–378

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Babuska I, Strouboulis T, Upadhyay CS and Gangaraj SK (1996). Computer-based proof of the existence of superconvergence points in the finite element method. Superconvergence of the derivatives in finite element solution of Laplace’s Poisson’s and elasticity equations. Numer Meth for PDEs 12: 347–392

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Owen DRJ and Hinton E (1980). Finite elements in plasticity: theory and practice. Pineridge Press, Swansea

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gharehbaghi, S.A., Khoei, A.R. Three-dimensional superconvergent patch recovery method and its application to data transferring in small-strain plasticity. Comput Mech 41, 293–312 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-007-0186-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-007-0186-6

Keywords

Navigation